I
am being advised from all corners by people who are genuinely concerned about
me, my rape case against a professor, the general state of affairs on campus
etc to not write the way i write. I understand everyone's concern.
Activists, lawyers, filmmakers and a lot many well-meaning people think that
what i write could be used against me in court. I am aware of it but that is
exactly what i want to challenge. I don't know what will become of the case.
What was important for me was for once to speak up against abuse. I did that. I
can die a happy woman.
I
have been chronicling the sexual harassment battle that a very small group of
students are fighting against all odds. I will continue to do that. I believe
that everything needs to be documented. Even if tomorrow i get killed or lose
my ability to think, i won't be worried that nobody wrote about what was done,
the fight that was fought, the victories, failures, sadness, happiness and much
more. I write the truth and if truth is used against me i am happy to be
indicted that way.
So
back to the battle.
Things
were becoming increasingly difficult for us. Intimidation was in full swing.
The attitude of students was the biggest problem. Even after the suspensions.
the talks, the newspaper reports, the solidarity statements, students continued
to be apolitical and aloof. Some of them wanted the suspended professors to be
taken back. Even people who never even enjoyed their classes spun stories of
how brilliant all of them were and fed it to the minds of first year students.
This was on top of the fan club that the professors had created on campus while
they were there.
I
was seeking help from a lot of people regarding whom i could approach to talk
about my case and the general atmosphere on campus. From two different sources
i was directed to an NGO called Swayam, run by Ms. Anuradha Kapoor. A few of us
went to them.
For
the first time i felt at ease before somebody. I could speak without being
judged. The major concern that we shared was how we could all have a lawyer for
our hearings in the ICC. Swayam was curious where we had got the idea from.
They said that the very purpose of ICC was to have a body which could handle
sexual harassment charges without making the complainants go through the court
proceedings. This was a relief and an epiphany for the complainants. Swayam
said that they would write about the way in which ICC functions in detail to
the institute. They also asked us to go the Women's Commission to request them
to do the same so that it would put some pressure on the institute. The institute
was co-operative. They wrote to another NGO suggested by Swayam requesting them
to send somebody who knew the exact procedure to the institute so that the ICC
could function accordingly. That was done. They even answered some of the
queries of the students. I saw hope. It was put out pretty soon when i heard
what the Dean of the institute had been doing.
The
Dean had taken all the trouble to go to a lot of students to trivialize the
sexual harassment complaints. He was reported to have said things like 'If
these are the standards of sexual harassment then i would also have to be
hung', 'If these are the standards of sexual harassment i would also have to go
to jail a number of times', 'Modern standards of sexual harassment cannot be
applied in SRFTI' etc to both students and faculty alike. When i had gone to him with my complaint of sexual harassment against a student he had laughed the matter off. When a group of
students with no power were trying to sensitize students on sexual harassment
the head of the institute was busy making sexual harassment sound like it was
weather.
I did not know how to tackle this problem. From where i stood (after
having complained against two professors and a student) he seemed untouchable.
One more complaint would gather more haters. I didn't have the strength. But
then there emerged three more students who were willing to complain and
testify. Was it possible to make authorities take action against a person who
did such things even though they held a superior position? What if like more
than half the campus the Dean's superiors themselves thought it was silly? We,
who now included faculty and students decided to give it a try despite our weak
knees. If the enquiry went against us it would mean that we would have to
continue being governed by the same Dean against whom we had complained. It
would be like having to live in the same house as the person who abused you
because he was set free for lack of 'proof'. Yet, we went ahead.
We
went to the Chairperson of our institute and told him our problem. He was curt
but assured us that he would look into the matter and that we could count on
him on that. I was skeptical as always but the next day we were informed that a
one person enquiry committee had been set up to investigate the matter. The
person was a retired judge. We would have to testify before him. It was to be
done outside the institute so that our identities could be protected. On the
day we had to testify i woke up to the news that the Dean had resigned. A
student had posted the news on a WhatsApp group and it was spreading like
wildfire. Some students said that they already knew about it. Some were
thinking about throwing a farewell party. Later in a faculty meeting the
Director announced to the faculty that the Dean had resigned. Nobody had a clue
about how that had happened. We went ahead to testify. We did. By evening the
news was corrected as 'the Dean had applied for voluntary retirement'. Either
way it meant that he would no longer be able to talk about the 'standards of
sexual harassment which could not be applied in SRFTI'. It was a victory. Led
majorly by women. Of students and professors who had their reasoning right. It
was the strongest message that was sent by the institute to the student
community of how serious the issue of sexual harassment was. Thank you SRFTI,
for this.
The
Dean admitted his guilt. His retirement application must have been approved
because we don't see him on campus anymore.
Yes,
the shit has hit the fan. It is a war now. There still are students who corner
other students and intimidate them. One person was asked why they had signed
the collective statement in support of the complainants. They believed that
that was what had led to the resignation/retirement of the Dean. People wanted
to find out who had complained against the Dean. I don't know what they were
going to do to them when they got to know. Even after the suspension of three
professors at one party a professor while talking about a human rights
violation that had happened to some students said 'Yes, it was bad but at least
no one was raped'. It stinks so much but it's okay because now everyone can
smell and see it. It will be easier to clean. And clean we will.
(y)
ReplyDelete